↓ Skip to main content

Exercise and NO production: relevance and implications in the cardiopulmonary system

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise and NO production: relevance and implications in the cardiopulmonary system
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2014.00073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexei V. Nosarev, Lyudmila V. Smagliy, Yana Anfinogenova, Sergey V. Popov, Leonid V. Kapilevich

Abstract

This article reviews the existing knowledge about the effects of physical exercise on nitric oxide (NO) production in the cardiopulmonary system. The authors review the sources of NO in the cardiopulmonary system; involvement of three forms of NO synthases (eNOS, nNOS, and iNOS) in exercise physiology; exercise-induced modulation of NO and/or NOS in physiological and pathophysiological conditions in human subjects and animal models in the absence and presence of pharmacological modulators; and significance of exercise-induced NO production in health and disease. The authors suggest that physical activity significantly improves functioning of the cardiovascular system through an increase in NO bioavailability, potentiation of antioxidant defense, and decrease in the expression of reactive oxygen species-forming enzymes. Regular physical exercises are considered a useful approach to treat cardiovascular diseases. Future studies should focus on detailed identification of (i) the exercise-mediated mechanisms of NO exchange; (ii) optimal exercise approaches to improve cardiovascular function in health and disease; and (iii) physical effort thresholds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Lecturer 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 20%
Sports and Recreations 16 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,314,171
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#3,936
of 8,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,658
of 352,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,971 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.