↓ Skip to main content

Novel roles for protein disulphide isomerase in disease states: a double edged sword?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel roles for protein disulphide isomerase in disease states: a double edged sword?
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2015.00030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonam Parakh, Julie D. Atkin

Abstract

Protein disulphide isomerase (PDI) is a multifunctional redox chaperone of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Since it was first discovered 40 years ago the functions ascribed to PDI have evolved significantly and recent studies have recognized its distinct functions, with adverse as well as protective effects in disease. Furthermore, post translational modifications of PDI abrogate its normal functional roles in specific disease states. This review focusses on recent studies that have identified novel functions for PDI relevant to specific diseases.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 165 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 20%
Student > Master 24 14%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 37 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Chemistry 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 45 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,804,309
of 26,429,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#1,137
of 10,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,396
of 280,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,429,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.