↓ Skip to main content

The Secret Life of Tethers: The Role of Tethering Factors in SNARE Complex Regulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Secret Life of Tethers: The Role of Tethering Factors in SNARE Complex Regulation
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2016.00042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle L. Dubuke, Mary Munson

Abstract

Trafficking in eukaryotic cells is a tightly regulated process to ensure correct cargo delivery to the proper destination organelle or plasma membrane. In this review, we focus on how the vesicle fusion machinery, the SNARE complex, is regulated by the interplay of the multisubunit tethering complexes (MTC) with the SNAREs and Sec1/Munc18 (SM) proteins. Although these factors are used in different stages of membrane trafficking, e.g., Golgi to plasma membrane transport vs. vacuolar fusion, and in a variety of diverse eukaryotic cell types, many commonalities between their functions are being revealed. We explore the various protein-protein interactions and findings from functional reconstitution studies in order to highlight both their common features and the differences in their modes of regulation. These studies serve as a starting point for mechanistic explorations in other systems.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 31%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 33%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 17 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,321,376
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#3,905
of 9,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,796
of 301,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#26
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.