↓ Skip to main content

Organ-to-Organ Communication: A Drosophila Gastrointestinal Tract Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Organ-to-Organ Communication: A Drosophila Gastrointestinal Tract Perspective
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2017.00029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiang Liu, Li Hua Jin

Abstract

The long-term maintenance of an organism's homeostasis and health relies on the accurate regulation of organ-organ communication. Recently, there has been growing interest in using the Drosophila gastrointestinal tract to elucidate the regulatory programs that underlie the complex interactions between organs. Data obtained in this field have dramatically improved our understanding of how organ-organ communication contributes to the regulation of various aspects of the intestine, including its metabolic and physiological status. However, although research uncovering regulatory programs associated with interorgan communication has provided key insights, the underlying mechanisms have not been extensively explored. In this review, we highlight recent findings describing gut-neighbor and neighbor-neighbor communication models in adults and larvae, respectively, with a special focus on how a range of critical strategies concerning continuous interorgan communication and adjustment can be used to manipulate different aspects of biological processes. Given the high degree of similarity between the Drosophila and mammalian intestinal epithelia, it can be anticipated that further analyses of the Drosophila gastrointestinal tract will facilitate the discovery of similar mechanisms underlying organ-organ communication in other mammalian organs, such as the human intestine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 30%
Neuroscience 25 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2017.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#4,522
of 9,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,072
of 309,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#36
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.