↓ Skip to main content

IL-1β Promotes a New Function of DNase I as a Transcription Factor for the Fas Receptor Gene

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IL-1β Promotes a New Function of DNase I as a Transcription Factor for the Fas Receptor Gene
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2018.00007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dhivya Thiyagarajan, Hege L. Pedersen, Natalya Seredkina, Kjersti D. Horvei, Lorena Arranz, Ramon Sonneveld, Tom Nijenhuis, Johan van der Vlag, Ole P. Rekvig

Abstract

Recently we described that endonuclease inactive DNase I translocated into the nucleus in response to increased endogenous IL-1β expression. Here, we demonstrate impact and function of translocated DNase I in tubular cells. Effect of cytokines on expression level and nuclear localisation of DNase I and corresponding levels of Fas receptor (FasR) and IL-1β were determined by confocal microscopy, qPCR and western blot analyses, in presence or absence of siRNA against IL-1β and DNase I mRNA. Nuclear DNase I bound to theFASpromotor region as determined by chromatin immuno-precipitation analysis. Data demonstrate that; (i) translocation of DNase I depended on endogenousde novo-expressed IL-1β, (ii) nuclear DNase I boundFASDNA, (iii) FasR expression increased after translocation of DNase I, (iv) interaction ofexogenousFas ligand (FasL) with upregulated FasR induced apoptosis in human tubular cells stimulated with TNFα. Thus, translocated DNase I most probably binds the promoter region of theFASgene and function as a transcription factor for FasR. In conclusion, DNase I not only executes chromatin degradationduringapoptosis and necrosis, but also primes the cellsforapoptosis by enhancing FasR expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,585,544
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#5,003
of 9,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,805
of 437,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#25
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.