↓ Skip to main content

The Good, the Bad and the Tick

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Good, the Bad and the Tick
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2019.00079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz, Agustin Estrada-Peña, Jose de la Fuente

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Unspecified 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Linguistics 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,255,147
of 24,793,937 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#1,265
of 10,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,783
of 357,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#14
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,793,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,167 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.