↓ Skip to main content

SLC20A1 Is Involved in Urinary Tract and Urorectal Development

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 9,286)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SLC20A1 Is Involved in Urinary Tract and Urorectal Development
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, August 2020
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2020.00567
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna Magdalena Rieke, Rong Zhang, Doreen Braun, Öznur Yilmaz, Anna S. Japp, Filipa M. Lopes, Michael Pleschka, Alina C. Hilger, Sophia Schneider, William G. Newman, Glenda M. Beaman, Agneta Nordenskjöld, Anne-Karoline Ebert, Martin Promm, Wolfgang H. Rösch, Raimund Stein, Karin Hirsch, Frank-Mattias Schäfer, Eberhard Schmiedeke, Thomas M. Boemers, Martin Lacher, Dietrich Kluth, Jan-Hendrik Gosemann, Magnus Anderberg, Gillian Barker, Gundela Holmdahl, Göran Läckgren, David Keene, Raimondo M. Cervellione, Elisa Giorgio, Massimo Di Grazia, Wouter F. J. Feitz, Carlo L. M. Marcelis, Iris A. L. M. Van Rooij, Arend Bökenkamp, Goedele M. A. Beckers, Catherine E. Keegan, Amit Sharma, Tikam Chand Dakal, Lars Wittler, Phillip Grote, Nadine Zwink, Ekkehart Jenetzky, Alfredo Brusco, Holger Thiele, Michael Ludwig, Ulrich Schweizer, Adrian S. Woolf, Benjamin Odermatt, Heiko Reutter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 14 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 13 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#401,580
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#30
of 9,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,123
of 399,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#5
of 455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.