The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Defective macroautophagy in organelle turnover: From basic mechanisms to human disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2022.1018778 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eloy Bejarano, José Antonio Rodríguez-Navarro, Roberta Filograna, Javier Calvo-Garrido |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,463,262
of 24,796,076 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#1,749
of 10,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,649
of 423,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#99
of 599 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,796,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,167 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 599 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.