↓ Skip to main content

OMIXCARE: OMICS technologies solved about 33% of the patients with heterogeneous rare neuro-developmental disorders and negative exome sequencing results and identified 13% additional candidate…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
OMIXCARE: OMICS technologies solved about 33% of the patients with heterogeneous rare neuro-developmental disorders and negative exome sequencing results and identified 13% additional candidate variants
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2022.1021785
Pubmed ID
Authors

Estelle Colin, Yannis Duffourd, Emilie Tisserant, Raissa Relator, Ange-Line Bruel, Frédéric Tran Mau-Them, Anne-Sophie Denommé-Pichon, Hana Safraou, Julian Delanne, Nolwenn Jean-Marçais, Boris Keren, Bertrand Isidor, Marie Vincent, Cyril Mignot, Delphine Heron, Alexandra Afenjar, Solveig Heide, Anne Faudet, Perrine Charles, Sylvie Odent, Yvan Herenger, Arthur Sorlin, Sébastien Moutton, Jennifer Kerkhof, Haley McConkey, Martin Chevarin, Charlotte Poë, Victor Couturier, Valentin Bourgeois, Patrick Callier, Anne Boland, Robert Olaso, Christophe Philippe, Bekim Sadikovic, Christel Thauvin-Robinet, Laurence Faivre, Jean-François Deleuze, Antonio Vitobello

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 9 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,042,046
of 24,666,614 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#1,657
of 10,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,815
of 434,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#77
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,666,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,085 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.