The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The expression profiles of circular RNAs and competing endogenous RNA networks in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2022.942853 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zi Liang, Liyan Liu, Xinyi Guo, Xia Wu, Yun-Li Yu, Ziyang Yu, Xiaolong Hu, Xing Zhang, Ji Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#17,980,413
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#4,378
of 9,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,410
of 440,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#291
of 599 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 599 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.