The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effective sequence analysis of 113 genes in 1,192 probands with retinitis pigmentosa and Leber congenital amaurosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2023.1112270 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daan M. Panneman, Rebekkah J. Hitti-Malin, Lara K. Holtes, Suzanne E. de Bruijn, Janine Reurink, Erica G. M. Boonen, Muhammad Imran Khan, Manir Ali, Sten Andréasson, Elfride De Baere, Sandro Banfi, Miriam Bauwens, Tamar Ben-Yosef, Béatrice Bocquet, Marieke De Bruyne, Berta de la Cerda, Frauke Coppieters, Pietro Farinelli, Thomas Guignard, Chris F. Inglehearn, Marianthi Karali, Ulrika Kjellström, Robert Koenekoop, Bart de Koning, Bart P. Leroy, Martin McKibbin, Isabelle Meunier, Konstantinos Nikopoulos, Koji M. Nishiguchi, James A. Poulter, Carlo Rivolta, Enrique Rodríguez de la Rúa, Patrick Saunders, Francesca Simonelli, Yasmin Tatour, Francesco Testa, Alberta A. H. J. Thiadens, Carmel Toomes, Anna M. Tracewska, Hoai Viet Tran, Hiroaki Ushida, Veronika Vaclavik, Virginie J. M. Verhoeven, Maartje van de Vorst, Christian Gilissen, Alexander Hoischen, Frans P. M. Cremers, Susanne Roosing |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,949,824
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#1,588
of 9,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,035
of 410,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#57
of 385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.