The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular typing and prognostic risk models for ovarian cancer: a study based on cell differentiation trajectory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2023.1131494 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tingfeng Chen, Tingting Ni, Lan Mu, Zhou Ying, Hanqun Zhang, Zi Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#20,048,502
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#5,040
of 10,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,768
of 355,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#102
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,543 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.