↓ Skip to main content

Autophagy in graves’ ophthalmopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autophagy in graves’ ophthalmopathy
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, April 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2023.1158279
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Qing Chen, Lian-Di Gao, Yi-Lin Liu, Ya Shen, Jia-Le Diao, Wei-Hua Yang, Rui-Li Wei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,941,352
of 23,572,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#6,322
of 9,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,452
of 249,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#103
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,452 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.