The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A novel prognostic prediction model of cuprotosis-related genes signature in hepatocellular carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2023.1180625 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruo-Nan Shao, Kun-Hao Bai, Qian-Qian Huang, Si-Liang Chen, Xin Huang, Yu-Jun Dai |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#21,533,762
of 26,430,863 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#5,987
of 10,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,515
of 367,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#128
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,430,863 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,716 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.