↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Role of non-coding RNAs in development and metastasis of solid tumours

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Role of non-coding RNAs in development and metastasis of solid tumours
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, September 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2023.1281200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bappaditya Roy, Samikshan Dutta, Chandrama Mukherjee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,101,047
of 24,498,639 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#3,578
of 9,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,956
of 155,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#28
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,498,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,990 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.