The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiplexing of TMT labeling reveals folate-deficient diet-specific proteome changes in NTDs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2024.1294726 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pei Pei, Jinying Shen, Xuejia He, Yubing Zeng, Ting Zhang, Shan Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,618,053
of 26,196,613 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#5,164
of 10,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,927
of 350,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#69
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,196,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,621 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.