The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dynamics of astrocytes Ca2+ signaling: a low-cost fluorescence customized system for 2D cultures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2024.1320672 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosa Musotto, Ulderico Wanderlingh, Angela D’Ascola, Michela Spatuzza, Maria Vincenza Catania, Maurizio De Pittà, Giovanni Pioggia |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,599,454
of 26,375,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#2,844
of 10,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,550
of 379,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#45
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.