The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effective mechanical potential of cell–cell interaction in tissues harboring cavity and in cell sheet toward morphogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2024.1414601 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiroshi Koyama, Hisashi Okumura, Tetsuhisa Otani, Atsushi M. Ito, Kazuyuki Nakamura, Kagayaki Kato, Toshihiko Fujimori |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,503,578
of 26,381,372 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#5,964
of 10,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,862
of 133,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#16
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,372 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.