↓ Skip to main content

A Theoretical Model for the Charging Dynamics of Associating Ionic Liquids

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Theoretical Model for the Charging Dynamics of Associating Ionic Liquids
Published in
Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, April 2022
DOI 10.3389/fceng.2022.852070
Authors

Jin Cheng, Haolan Tao, Ke Ma, Jie Yang, Cheng Lian, Honglai Liu, Jianzhong Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#18,980,014
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemical Engineering
#121
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,912
of 443,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemical Engineering
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.