↓ Skip to main content

In silico enzyme screening identifies an SDR ketoreductase from Thermus caliditerrae as an attractive biocatalyst and promising candidate for protein engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemical Biology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In silico enzyme screening identifies an SDR ketoreductase from Thermus caliditerrae as an attractive biocatalyst and promising candidate for protein engineering
Published in
Frontiers in Chemical Biology, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fchbi.2024.1425501
Authors

Yvett Sosa, Bhav Kapur, Jessica Hurtak, Laura J. Kingsley, Hao Wu, Stefanie Gruber, Herbert Nar, Saad Khattabi, Jesus Seco Moral, Maria Fátima Lucas, Caterina Martin, Nikola Lončar, Frederic Buono, Noah Pefaur, Andrew E. Nixon, Jinhua J. Song

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,509,553
of 26,388,114 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemical Biology
#13
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,042
of 134,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemical Biology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.