The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electrochemical sensors and devices for heavy metals assay in water: the French groups' contribution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2014.00019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luca Pujol, David Evrard, Karine Groenen-Serrano, Mathilde Freyssinier, Audrey Ruffien-Cizsak, Pierre Gros |
| Abstract |
A great challenge in the area of heavy metal trace detection is the development of electrochemical techniques and devices which are user-friendly, robust, selective, with low detection limits and allowing fast analyses. This review presents the major contribution of the French scientific academic community in the field of electrochemical sensors and electroanalytical methods within the last 20 years. From the well-known polarography to the up-to-date generation of functionalized interfaces, the different strategies dedicated to analytical performances improvement are exposed: stripping voltammetry, solid mercury-free electrode, ion selective sensor, carbon based materials, chemically modified electrodes, nano-structured surfaces. The paper particularly emphasizes their advantages and limits face to the last Water Frame Directive devoted to the Environmental Quality Standards for heavy metals. Recent trends on trace metal speciation as well as on automatic "on line" monitoring devices are also evoked. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 368 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 19% |
| Researcher | 44 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 13% |
| Unknown | 116 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 95 | 26% |
| Engineering | 39 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 21 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 16 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 13% |
| Unknown | 137 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,292,663
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#817
of 6,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,146
of 241,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,770 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.