↓ Skip to main content

Review on dry reforming of methane, a potentially more environmentally-friendly approach to the increasing natural gas exploitation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
405 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
648 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review on dry reforming of methane, a potentially more environmentally-friendly approach to the increasing natural gas exploitation
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2014.00081
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Michel Lavoie

Abstract

With the actual growth of the natural gas industry in the US as well as the potential and availability of this non-renewable carbon source worldwide, reforming of methane gas is getting increasing attention. Methane can be used for the production of heat or electricity, as well, it can be converted to syngas, a building block that could lead to the production of liquid fuels and chemicals, a very promising pathway in light of the increasing price of oil. Amongst the different reforming techniques, dry reforming could represent a very interesting approach both to valorize a cheap source or carbon (CO2) as well as to reduce the overall carbon footprint of the increasing worldwide fossil-based methane consumption. In this short review, attention will be given to the thermodynamics of dry reforming followed by an investigation on dry reforming using heterogeneous catalyst by focusing on the most popular elements used in literature for dry reforming. Attention will as well be given to other emerging techniques that may allow countering at one point the high thermodynamic penalties that accompanies conversion of methane using carbon dioxide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 648 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 645 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 121 19%
Student > Master 97 15%
Researcher 76 12%
Student > Bachelor 53 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 7%
Other 70 11%
Unknown 188 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 142 22%
Engineering 93 14%
Chemistry 88 14%
Energy 24 4%
Materials Science 22 3%
Other 39 6%
Unknown 240 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#16,487,221
of 26,020,829 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#1,277
of 6,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,814
of 272,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,020,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,849 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.