↓ Skip to main content

Metal Cations in G-Quadruplex Folding and Stability

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
460 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
549 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metal Cations in G-Quadruplex Folding and Stability
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2016.00038
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debmalya Bhattacharyya, Gayan Mirihana Arachchilage, Soumitra Basu

Abstract

This review is focused on the structural and physicochemical aspects of metal cation coordination to G-Quadruplexes (GQ) and their effects on GQ stability and conformation. G-quadruplex structures are non-canonical secondary structures formed by both DNA and RNA. G-quadruplexes regulate a wide range of important biochemical processes. Besides the sequence requirements, the coordination of monovalent cations in the GQ is essential for its formation and determines the stability and polymorphism of GQ structures. The nature, location, and dynamics of the cation coordination and their impact on the overall GQ stability are dependent on several factors such as the ionic radii, hydration energy, and the bonding strength to the O6 of guanines. The intracellular monovalent cation concentration and the localized ion concentrations determine the formation of GQs and can potentially dictate their regulatory roles. A wide range of biochemical and biophysical studies on an array of GQ enabling sequences have generated at a minimum the knowledge base that allows us to often predict the stability of GQs in the presence of the physiologically relevant metal ions, however, prediction of conformation of such GQs is still out of the realm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 549 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 549 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 132 24%
Student > Master 65 12%
Student > Bachelor 63 11%
Researcher 62 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 5%
Other 38 7%
Unknown 162 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 142 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 138 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 2%
Physics and Astronomy 10 2%
Other 33 6%
Unknown 188 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#18,961,244
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,285
of 6,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,288
of 332,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.