↓ Skip to main content

Computational Tool for Fast in silico Evaluation of hERG K+ Channel Affinity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational Tool for Fast in silico Evaluation of hERG K+ Channel Affinity
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2017.00007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulia Chemi, Sandra Gemma, Giuseppe Campiani, Simone Brogi, Stefania Butini, Margherita Brindisi

Abstract

The development of a novel comprehensive approach for the prediction of hERG activity is herein presented. Software Phase has been used to derive a 3D-QSAR model, employing as alignment rule a common pharmacophore built on a subset of 22 highly active compounds (threshold Ki: 50 nM) against hERG K(+) channel. Five features comprised the pharmacophore: two aromatic rings (R1 and R2), one hydrogen-bond acceptor (A), one hydrophobic site (H), and one positive ionizable function (P). The sequential 3D-QSAR model developed with a set of 421 compounds (randomly divided in training and test set) yielded a test set (Q(2)) = 0.802 and proved to be predictive with respect to an external test set of 309 compounds that were not used to generate the model ([Formula: see text] = 0.860). Furthermore, the model was submitted to an in silico validation for assessing the reliability of the approach, by applying a decoys set, evaluating the Güner and Henry score (GH) and the Enrichment Factor (EF), and by using the ROC curve analysis. The outcome demonstrated the high predictive power of the inclusive 3D-QSAR model developed for the hERG K(+) channel blockers, confirming the fundamental validity of the chosen approach for obtaining a fast proprietary cardiotoxicity predictive tool to be employed for rationally designing compounds with reduced hERG K(+) channel activity at the early steps of the drug discovery trajectory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 28%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 20 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#20,406,219
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,926
of 5,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,173
of 311,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#25
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,985 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.