↓ Skip to main content

Anticorrosive Effects of Some Thiophene Derivatives Against the Corrosion of Iron: A Computational Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anticorrosive Effects of Some Thiophene Derivatives Against the Corrosion of Iron: A Computational Study
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2018.00155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Guo, Zaki S. Safi, Savas Kaya, Wei Shi, Burak Tüzün, Nail Altunay, Cemal Kaya

Abstract

It is known that iron is one of the most widely used metals in industrial production. In this work, the inhibition performances of three thiophene derivatives on the corrosion of iron were investigated in the light of several theoretical approaches. In the section including DFT calculations, several global reactivity descriptors such as EHOMO, ELUMO, ionization energy (I), electron affinity (A), HOMO-LUMO energy gap (ΔE), chemical hardness (η), softness (σ), as well as local reactivity descriptors like Fukui indices, local softness, and local electrophilicity were considered and discussed. The adsorption behaviors of considered thiophene derivatives on Fe(110) surface were investigated using molecular dynamics simulation approach. To determine the most active corrosion inhibitor among studied thiophene derivatives, we used the principle component analysis (PCA) and agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis (AHCA). Accordingly, all data obtained using various theoretical calculation techniques are consistent with experiments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Professor 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 36 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 26 33%
Chemical Engineering 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 41 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,645,019
of 23,455,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#69
of 6,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,345
of 328,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,455,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.