↓ Skip to main content

Synthesis and Electrochemical Performance of Molybdenum Disulfide-Reduced Graphene Oxide-Polyaniline Ternary Composites for Supercapacitors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synthesis and Electrochemical Performance of Molybdenum Disulfide-Reduced Graphene Oxide-Polyaniline Ternary Composites for Supercapacitors
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2018.00218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li-Zhong Bai, Yan-Hui Wang, Shuai-Shuai Cheng, Fang Li, Zhi-Yi Zhang, Ya-Qing Liu

Abstract

Molybdenum disulfide/reduced graphene oxide/polyaniline ternary composites (MoS2/rGO/PANI) were designed and synthesized by a facile two-step approach including hydrothermal and in situ polymerization process. The MoS2/rGO/PANI composites presented an interconnected 3D network architecture, in which PANI uniformly coated the outer surface of the MoS2/rGO binary composite. The MoS2/rGO/PANI composites with a weight percent of 80% (MGP-80) exhibits the best specific capacitance (570 F g-1 at 1 A g-1) and cycling stabilities (78.6% retained capacitance after 500 cycles at 1 A g-1). The excellent electrochemical capacitive performance is attributed to its 3D network structure and the synergistic effects among the three components that make the composites obtain both pseudocapacitance and double-layer capacitance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Student > Master 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 16%
Materials Science 6 16%
Chemical Engineering 3 8%
Chemistry 3 8%
Energy 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,639,173
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,237
of 6,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,548
of 328,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#65
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.