↓ Skip to main content

Observation of Microstructure Formation During Freeze-Drying of Dextrin Solution by in-situ X-ray Computed Tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Observation of Microstructure Formation During Freeze-Drying of Dextrin Solution by in-situ X-ray Computed Tomography
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2018.00418
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyuya Nakagawa, Shinri Tamiya, Shu Sakamoto, Gabsoo Do, Shinji Kono

Abstract

In-situ X-ray computed tomography (CT) was used to observe microstructure formations during freeze-drying of a dextrin solution. A specially designed freeze-drying stage was equipped at the X-ray CT stage. Frozen and dried microstructures were successfully observed. The CT images of the frozen solution clarified the ice crystal size increase and obvious boundary formation between the ice and freeze-concentrated phases upon performing post-freezing annealing at -5°C. These structural modifications emerged owing to Ostwald ripening and glassy phase relaxation. During the freeze-drying, pore microstructures formed as a consequence of water removal. The pores were replicas of the original ice microstructures; some pore microstructures newly formed by the removal of water. The latter mechanism was more obvious in the non-annealed sample than in the annealed sample. The glassy phase in the non-annealed solution was not perfectly freeze-concentrated; water was rapidly removed from this phase, losing its original microstructure. At this moment, the freeze-concentrated region piled up to new pore walls, which consequently thickened the pore walls. An image analysis estimated that the mean pore wall thicknesses for the non-annealed and annealed samples were 13.5 and 8.6 μm, respectively. It was suggested that the advantages of annealing are not only to reduce drying time owing to the modification of ice crystal morphologies but also to avoid quality loss related to the structural deformation of the glassy matters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 37%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 5 19%
Materials Science 5 19%
Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,292
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,950
of 6,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,713
of 337,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#86
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.