The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implication of Non-electrostatic Contribution to Deionization in Flow-Electrode CDI: Case Study of Nitrate Removal From Contaminated Source Waters
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2019.00146 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jingke Song, Jinxing Ma, Changyong Zhang, Calvin He, T. David Waite |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
Student > Master | 8 | 20% |
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 10 | 24% |
Chemistry | 9 | 22% |
Chemical Engineering | 6 | 15% |
Materials Science | 2 | 5% |
Energy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,170,310
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#556
of 5,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,181
of 349,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#35
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.