The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 4β-N-Acetylamino Substituted Podophyllotoxin Derivatives as Novel Anticancer Agents
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2019.00253 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jinbao Wei, Jinghong Chen, Peijun Ju, Le Ma, Li Chen, Weidong Ma, Tao Zheng, Guangyi Yang, Yong-Xiang Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 3 | 27% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,846,128
of 23,796,227 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#694
of 6,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,121
of 352,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#39
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,796,227 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.