You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are Ionic Liquids Better Extracting Agents Than Toxic Volatile Organic Solvents? A Combination of Ionic Liquids, Microwave and LC/MS/MS, Applied to the Lichen Stereocaulon glareosum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2020.00450 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erika Calla-Quispe, Juana Robles, Carlos Areche, Beatriz Sepulveda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 6 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#20,620,796
of 23,211,181 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,966
of 6,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,431
of 396,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#169
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,211,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,081 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.