↓ Skip to main content

Fast Hollow Fiber Liquid-Phase Microextraction as a Greener Alternative for the Determination of N,N-Dimethyltryptamine and Harmala Alkaloids in Human Urine

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fast Hollow Fiber Liquid-Phase Microextraction as a Greener Alternative for the Determination of N,N-Dimethyltryptamine and Harmala Alkaloids in Human Urine
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2020.558501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriela de Oliveira Silveira, Felipe Rebello Lourenço, Vitor Bruno, Mauricio Yonamine

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 15 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Chemistry 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Materials Science 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 16 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,986,645
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#1,215
of 6,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,736
of 423,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#55
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,704 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.