The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metal-free photo-induced sulfidation of aryl iodide and other chalcogenation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2022.941016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuai Mao, Yahao Zhao, Zixuan Luo, Ruizhe Wang, Bo Yuan, Jianping Hu, Linghao Hu, San-Qi Zhang, Xiaoxing Ye, Mingliang Wang, Zhengkai Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#17,909,758
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#1,740
of 6,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,575
of 431,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#76
of 463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,006 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.