The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular identification of wines using in situ liquid SIMS and PCA analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2023.1124229 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cuixia Cheng, Yadong Zhou, Holden M. Nelson, Tasneem Ahmadullah, Hailan Piao, Zhaoying Wang, Wenxiao Guo, Jun-Gang Wang, Guosong Lai, Zihua Zhu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#17,378,904
of 25,503,365 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#1,804
of 6,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,289
of 423,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#60
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,503,365 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,802 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.