↓ Skip to main content

Development, validation and a GAPI greenness assessment for the determination of 103 pesticides in mango fruit drink using LC-MS/MS

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development, validation and a GAPI greenness assessment for the determination of 103 pesticides in mango fruit drink using LC-MS/MS
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, November 2023
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2023.1283895
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madhu Tippannanavar, Tirthankar Banerjee, Sumit Shekhar, Sudama Ram Sahu, Bijendra Singh, Neethu Narayanan, Shalini Gaur Rudra, Bidisha Chakrabarti, Suman Gupta, Anupama Singh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#21,113,955
of 25,935,829 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,544
of 6,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,188
of 374,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#43
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,935,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.