↓ Skip to main content

Preparation of an N–S dual-doped black fungus porous carbon matrix and its application in high-performance Li–S batteries

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preparation of an N–S dual-doped black fungus porous carbon matrix and its application in high-performance Li–S batteries
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2023.1288013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liping Zhao, Ye Zhao, Lihe Zhao, Gang Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#21,303,985
of 26,160,558 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,583
of 6,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,703
of 374,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#47
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,160,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,859 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.