↓ Skip to main content

Matching method between nanoparticle displacement agent size and pore throat in low permeability reservoir

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Matching method between nanoparticle displacement agent size and pore throat in low permeability reservoir
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2023.1289271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianjiang Wu, Yanhong Zhao, Yichi Zhang, Zhixiao Li, Junwei Su

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#20,982,612
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,511
of 6,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,751
of 364,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#42
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,832 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.