↓ Skip to main content

Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel bi-gold mitocans in lung cancer cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel bi-gold mitocans in lung cancer cells
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2023.1292115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenwen Ding, Qingbin Cui, Wenhua Lu, Yongliang Du, Yao Luo, Yumin Hu, Peng Huang, Shijun Wen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,629,205
of 26,213,016 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,050
of 6,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,724
of 381,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#34
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.