The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Broad-spectrum pH functional chitosan–phosphatase beads for the generation of plant-available phosphorus: utilizing the insoluble P pool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2024.1359191 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kasturika Konwar, Himanku Boruah, Rimjim Gogoi, Anudhriti Boruah, Arup Borgohain, Madhusmita Baruah, Subham Protim Gogoi, Tanmoy Karak, Jiban Saikia |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#21,042,630
of 25,843,331 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,522
of 6,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,862
of 264,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#26
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,843,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,834 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.