You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vivo and in silico studies of the effects of oil extracted from Cannabis sativa L. seeds on healing of burned skin wounds in rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2024.1381527 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mouna Bouarfa, Mohamed Chebaibi, Fatima Ez-Zahra Amrati, Zouhair Souirti, Hamza Saghrouchni, Yassine El atki, Khalid Bekkouche, Hajar Mourabiti, Amina Bari, John P. Giesy, Mohamed Mohany, Salim S. Al-Rejaie, Mourad A. M. Aboul-Soud, Dalila Bousta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,321,143
of 26,205,030 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#1,457
of 6,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,922
of 207,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,205,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.