The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bioactive plant waste components targeting oral bacterial pathogens as a promising strategy for biofilm eradication
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2024.1406869 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Saima Mashal, Aisha Siddiqua, Niamat Ullah, Rabia Baloch, Momin Khan, Syed Zia Ul Hasnain, Muhammad Imran Aziz, Elchin Huseynov, Dragica Selakovic, Gvozden Rosic, Trobjon Makhkamov, Akramjon Yuldashev, Sokhib Islamov, Nilufar Abdullayeva, Uktam Khujanazarov, Adnan Amin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,543,207
of 26,445,299 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,620
of 6,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,067
of 138,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#16
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,918 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.