↓ Skip to main content

The human urinary microbiome; bacterial DNA in voided urine of asymptomatic adults

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
16 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
317 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
347 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The human urinary microbiome; bacterial DNA in voided urine of asymptomatic adults
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debbie A. Lewis, Richard Brown, Jon Williams, Paul White, S. Kim Jacobson, Julian R. Marchesi, Marcus J. Drake

Abstract

The urinary microbiome of healthy individuals and the way it alters with ageing have not been characterized and may influence disease processes. Conventional microbiological methods have limited scope to capture the full spectrum of urinary bacterial species. We studied the urinary microbiota from a population of healthy individuals, ranging from 26 to 90 years of age, by amplification of the 16S rRNA gene, with resulting amplicons analyzed by 454 pyrosequencing. Mid-stream urine (MSU) was collected by the "clean-catch" method. Quantitative PCR of 16S rRNA genes in urine samples, allowed relative enumeration of the bacterial loads. Analysis of the samples indicates that females had a more heterogeneous mix of bacterial genera compared to the male samples and generally had representative members of the phyla Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Analysis of the data leads us to conclude that a "core" urinary microbiome could potentially exist, when samples are grouped by age with fluctuation in abundance between age groups. The study also revealed age-specific genera Jonquetella, Parvimonas, Proteiniphilum, and Saccharofermentans. In conclusion, conventional microbiological methods are inadequate to fully identify around two-thirds of the bacteria identified in this study. Whilst this proof-of-principle study has limitations due to the sample size, the discoveries evident in this sample data are strongly suggestive that a larger study on the urinary microbiome should be encouraged and that the identification of specific genera at particular ages may be relevant to pathogenesis of clinical conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 339 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 15%
Student > Master 40 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Other 21 6%
Other 67 19%
Unknown 75 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 2%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 82 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,022,343
of 26,298,949 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#171
of 8,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,872
of 294,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#3
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,298,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.