↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of novel oral vaccine candidates and validation of a caprine model of Johne's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of novel oral vaccine candidates and validation of a caprine model of Johne's disease
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Murray E. Hines, Sue E. Turnquist, Marcia R. S. Ilha, Sreekumari Rajeev, Arthur L. Jones, Lisa Whittington, John P. Bannantine, Raúl G. Barletta, Yrjö T. Gröhn, Robab Katani, Adel M. Talaat, Lingling Li, Vivek Kapur

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,415,382
of 25,139,853 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1,973
of 7,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,950
of 227,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,139,853 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.