The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Modulation of the Inflammasome Signaling Pathway by Enteropathogenic and Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00089 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hilo Yen, Masaki Karino, Toru Tobe |
Abstract |
Innate immunity is an essential component in the protection of a host against pathogens. Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EPEC and EHEC, respectively) are known to modulate the innate immune responses of infected cells. The interference is dependent on their type III secretion system (T3SS) and T3SS-dependent effector proteins. Furthermore, these cytosolically injected effectors have been demonstrated to engage multiple immune signaling pathways, including the IFN/STAT, MAPK, NF-κB, and inflammasome pathways. In this review, recent work describing the interaction between EPEC/EHEC and the inflammasome pathway will be discussed. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 22% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#23,504,487
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#6,520
of 8,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,029
of 352,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#40
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.