↓ Skip to main content

Adhesion and Invasion of Gastric Mucosa Epithelial Cells by Helicobacter pylori

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adhesion and Invasion of Gastric Mucosa Epithelial Cells by Helicobacter pylori
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Huang, Qi-long Wang, Dan-dan Cheng, Wen-ting Xu, Nong-hua Lu

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori is the main pathogenic bacterium involved in chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer and a class 1 carcinogen in gastric cancer. Current research focuses on the pathogenicity of H. pylori and the mechanism by which it colonizes the gastric mucosa. An increasing number of in vivo and in vitro studies demonstrate that H. pylori can invade and proliferate in epithelial cells, suggesting that this process might play an important role in disease induction, immune escape and chronic infection. Therefore, to explore the process and mechanism of adhesion and invasion of gastric mucosa epithelial cells by H. pylori is particularly important. This review examines the relevant studies and describes evidence regarding the adhesion to and invasion of gastric mucosa epithelial cells by H. pylori.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 254 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 18%
Student > Master 39 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Researcher 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 98 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 38 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 98 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,381,909
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#218
of 7,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,761
of 422,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.