↓ Skip to main content

Gene Duplication Analysis Reveals No Ancient Whole Genome Duplication but Extensive Small-Scale Duplications during Genome Evolution and Adaptation of Schistosoma mansoni

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gene Duplication Analysis Reveals No Ancient Whole Genome Duplication but Extensive Small-Scale Duplications during Genome Evolution and Adaptation of Schistosoma mansoni
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00412
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuai Wang, Xing-quan Zhu, Xuepeng Cai

Abstract

Gene duplication (GD), thought to facilitate evolutionary innovation and adaptation, has been studied in many phylogenetic lineages. However, it remains poorly investigated in trematodes, a medically important parasite group that has been evolutionarily specialized during long-term host-parasite interaction. In this study, we conducted a genome-wide study of GD modes and contributions in Schistosoma mansoni, a pathogen causing human schistosomiasis. We combined several lines of evidence provided by duplicate age distributions, genomic sequence similarity, depth-of-coverage and gene synteny to identify the dominant drivers that contribute to the origins of new genes in this parasite. The gene divergences following duplication events (gene structure, expression and function retention) were also analyzed. Our results reveal that the genome lacks whole genome duplication (WGD) in a long evolutionary time and has few large segmental duplications, but is extensively shaped by the continuous small-scale gene duplications (SSGDs) (i.e., dispersed, tandem and proximal GDs) that may be derived from (retro-) transposition and unequal crossing over. Additionally, our study shows that the genes generated by tandem duplications have the smallest divergence during the evolution. Finally, we demonstrate that SSGDs, especially the tandem duplications, greatly contribute to the expansions of some preferentially retained pathogenesis-associated gene families that are associated with the parasite's survival during infection. This study is the first to systematically summarize the landscape of GDs in trematodes and provides new insights of adaptations to parasitism linked to GD events for these parasites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 26%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#13,570,270
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,258
of 6,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,115
of 318,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#46
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.