↓ Skip to main content

Growth of Chlamydia pneumoniae Is Enhanced in Cells with Impaired Mitochondrial Function

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Growth of Chlamydia pneumoniae Is Enhanced in Cells with Impaired Mitochondrial Function
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00499
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadja Käding, Inga Kaufhold, Constanze Müller, Marta Szaszák, Kensuke Shima, Thomas Weinmaier, Rodrigo Lomas, Ana Conesa, Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin, Thomas Rattei, Jan Rupp

Abstract

Effective growth and replication of obligate intracellular pathogens depend on host cell metabolism. How this is connected to host cell mitochondrial function has not been studied so far. Recent studies suggest that growth of intracellular bacteria such as Chlamydia pneumoniae is enhanced in a low oxygen environment, arguing for a particular mechanistic role of the mitochondrial respiration in controlling intracellular progeny. Metabolic changes in C. pneumoniae infected epithelial cells were analyzed under normoxic (O2 ≈ 20%) and hypoxic conditions (O2 < 3%). We observed that infection of epithelial cells with C. pneumoniae under normoxia impaired mitochondrial function characterized by an enhanced mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS generation. Knockdown and mutation of the host cell ATP synthase resulted in an increased chlamydial replication already under normoxic conditions. As expected, mitochondrial hyperpolarization was observed in non-infected control cells cultured under hypoxic conditions, which was beneficial for C. pneumoniae growth. Taken together, functional and genetically encoded mitochondrial dysfunction strongly promotes intracellular growth of C. pneumoniae.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,577,751
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4,914
of 6,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,145
of 439,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#87
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.