↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of Live Bacterial Sensing for Chemotaxis and Phagocytosis and of Macropinocytosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantification of Live Bacterial Sensing for Chemotaxis and Phagocytosis and of Macropinocytosis
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Netra P. Meena, Alan R. Kimmel

Abstract

Initial immunological defense mechanisms to pathogen invasion rely on innate pathways of chemotaxis and phagocytosis, original to ancient phagocytes. Although chemotaxis has been well-studied in mammalian and model systems using purified chemoattractants in defined conditions, directed movement toward live bacteria has been more difficult to assess.Dictyostelium discoideumis a professional phagocyte that chemotaxes toward bacteria during growth-phase in a process to locate nutrient sources. UsingDictyosteliumas a model, we have developed a system that is able to quantify chemotaxis to very high sensitivity. Here,Dictyosteliumcan detect various chemoattractants at concentrations <1 nM. Given this exceedingly sensitive signal response,Dictyosteliumwill migrate directionally toward live gram positive and gram negative bacteria, in a highly quantifiable manner, and dependent upon bacterially-secreted chemoattractants. Additionally, we have developed a real-time, quantitative assay for phagocytosis of live gram positive and gram negative bacteria. To extend the analyses of endocytic functions, we further modified the system to quantify cellular uptakeviamacropinocytosis of smaller (<100 kDa) molecules. These various approaches provide novel means to dissect potential for identification of novel chemoattractants and mechanistic factors that are essential for chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and/or macropinocytosis and for more detailed understanding in host-pathogen interactive defenses.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Unspecified 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,589,103
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4,921
of 6,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,740
of 331,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#90
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.