↓ Skip to main content

Visceral Leishmaniasis IgG1 Rapid Monitoring of Cure vs. Relapse, and Potential for Diagnosis of Post Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visceral Leishmaniasis IgG1 Rapid Monitoring of Cure vs. Relapse, and Potential for Diagnosis of Post Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, December 2018
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00427
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tegwen Marlais, Tapan Bhattacharyya, Om Prakash Singh, Pascal Mertens, Quentin Gilleman, Caroline Thunissen, Bruno C. Bremer Hinckel, Callum Pearson, Bathsheba L. Gardner, Stephanie Airs, Marianne de la Roche, Kiera Hayes, Hannah Hafezi, Andrew K. Falconar, Osama Eisa, Alfarazdeg Saad, Basudha Khanal, Narayan Raj Bhattarai, Suman Rijal, Marleen Boelaert, Sayda El-Safi, Shyam Sundar, Michael A. Miles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 16%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 14%
Mathematics 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 20 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,912,534
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#309
of 7,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,230
of 449,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#6
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.