The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX, MALDI-TOF MS, and rDNA Sequencing for a Wide Range of Clinically Isolated Yeast Species: Improved Identification by Combining 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX as an Alternative Strategy for Developing Countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amir Arastehfar, Farnaz Daneshnia, Mohammad Kord, Maryam Roudbary, Hossein Zarrinfar, Wenjie Fang, Sayed Jamal Hashemi, Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh, Sadegh Khodavaisy, Weihua Pan, Wanqing Liao, Hamid Badali, Sassan Rezaie, Kamiar Zomorodian, Ferry Hagen, Teun Boekhout |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Thailand | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,334,681
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1,572
of 6,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,651
of 478,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#33
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.