The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigant, Bingpeng Irrigant, and Fufang Bingpeng Irrigant as Endodontic Irrigants During Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00145 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yan Shi, Zhipeng Deng, Yulu Yang, Lanyue Cui, Tingtao Chen, Mingjing Hu, Lei Xie, Jian Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 47% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2019.
All research outputs
#20,572,330
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#6,155
of 6,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,522
of 350,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#106
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.